Oliver Crawford vs Yanaki Milev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 May at 04:07 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
O. Crawford vs Y. Milev

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BUL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Crawford 1 - 0 Milev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Oliver Crawford winning 2 and Yanaki Milev winning 0. The last match between Oliver Crawford and Yanaki Milev was at the M25 Kursumlijska Banja, 08-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Oliver Crawford getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Crawford | 1 |
| Milev | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Kursumlijska Banja(05-08-25)
O. Crawford vs Y. Milev H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $57,200 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 68.42% (325-150) | Career Total W/L | 56.05% (125-98) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 13 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
O. Crawford vs Y. Milev Match Preview:
- Milev's recent second serve point win rate stands at 42.38%, while Crawford has a slightly higher rate at 45.07%. Could this small edge be a decisive factor?
- When it comes to returning second serves, Crawford again edges past with 45.91% compared to Milev's 44.58%, indicating a marginal advantage in this area.
- In first serve returns, Milev fares better with 31.72% over Crawford’s 28.43%, suggesting Milev might exploit Crawford's serves more effectively.
- Break point resilience under pressure sees Crawford with a higher success rate, saving 55.5% of breakpoints against Milev's 51.91%.
- Overall match performances in the past year heavily favor Crawford, who won 73.97% of matches versus Milev’s 56.6%.
- Milev excels on clay with a 58% win record, but struggles on indoor hard courts with only 25%. Conversely, Crawford thrives on hard courts with 71% success, though falters on grass.
- Crawford has higher success at similar event levels, winning 81.97% of matches, compared to Milev's 57.5%, possibly indicating superior form.
- Milev has faced slightly stronger opponents ranking-wise, with an average opponent rank of 390.43 against Crawford’s 452.37.
- In matches reaching a deciding set, Crawford has a superior win rate at 65% compared to Milev’s 57%.
- Under breakpoint scenarios, Milev shows more efficiency by converting 37.61% of opportunities, whereas Crawford manages 33.99%.
Editorial Prediction (May 8, 2025, UTC):
Crawford's recent form in second serve points, return games, and break point defense give them a slight statistical edge over Milev. While Milev holds a slight advantage in breakpoint conversion and facing higher-ranked opponents, Crawford's overall match performance is superior.
Considering Crawford's exceptional performance on hard courts and their better win rate in deciding sets, these factors contribute to tipping the scales in their favor.
Based on the analyzed statistics and recent trends, Crawford is more likely to win the upcoming tennis match against Milev.
Oliver Crawford vs Yanaki Milev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
O. Crawford vs Y. Milev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:24:7 | Average Match Time | 1:24:7 |
| 77% (41/53) | 1st Serve % | 64% (38/59) |
| 66% (27/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (26/38) |
| 50% (6/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (8/21) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 42% (25/59) | Return Points Win % | 38% (20/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
O. Crawford Recent Matches Played
Y. Milev Recent Matches Played

O. Crawford vs Y. Milev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.42% (325/150) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.05% (125/98) |
| 64.69% (698/381) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.58% (286/238) |
| 56.19% (5566/4340) | Games Win/Loss | 51.18% (2565/2447) |
| 69.65% (140/61) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 68.48% (176/81) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.14% (116/87) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1182 | Aces Total | 522 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 973 | Total Double Faults | 878 |
| 1:32:21 | Average Match Time | 1:40:39 |
| 445.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 441.43 |
| 63% (17909/28349) | 1st Serve % | 57% (8509/14967) |
| 69% (12272/17909) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (5654/8509) |
| 53% (5525/10440) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3054/6458) |
| 45% (1361/3005) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (731/1627) |
| 41% (11514/27836) | Return Points Win % | 42% (6249/14849) |
| 30.00% (3/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 51.30% (59/56) | Challenger W/L | 37.84% (14/23) |
| 75.36% (263/86) | Futures W/L | 60.56% (109/71) |
| 69% (318/463) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (123/221) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (69/123) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (38/61) |
| 62% (80/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (41/78) |
| 91% (312/284) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (121/103) |
| 9% (312/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (121/18) |
| 25% (163/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (102/22) |